4 ms·
Those investments in office furniture, remodels, etc. are already sunk costs though. Why would they be used to justify RTO? you answered your own question. sun
by tessierashpool 3y ago
Those investments in office furniture, remodels, etc. are already sunk costs though. Why would they be used to justify RTO?
you answered your own question. sunk costs fallacy.
- smith7018 3y agoIndustry-wide? I guess I'm naive for thinking that some companies must have some smart people in the room and point out the fallacy
- ghaff 3y agoI know a lot of people here think executives are idiots but I really have trouble believing that any CEO is sitting there thinking "Damn. If I don't get people back into the office, all these office chairs we spent good money on will go to waste."
- smith7018 3y agoExactly. Same with "Damn. We have to drive away our best talent to fill occupancy in the office we already signed a lease on despite rent being a fixed cost that isn't impacted by occupancy." Like, it just doesn't make sense to me.
- ghaff 3y agoI do understand to the degree tax incentives get involved. But, whether having deluded themselves or not, I do believe most execs pushing RTO are doing so for reasons they think are sound for collaboration, cultural, or other rational reasons.