It’s not just about errors. They have a lot more context than the LLM has, so it’s mostly about building the scaffold of boilerplate and adding in the specific

It’s not just about errors. They have a lot more context than the LLM has, so it’s mostly about building the scaffold of boilerplate and adding in the specific detail of their points to the court. And I think every competent lawyer has heard the news of the complacent lawyers who got called out. He specifically said they don’t use the LLMs as a source of information on case law - they have powerful search tools already and they are skilled lawyers. He sees the LLMs as a powerful tool in their tool box, not as a replacement for junior attorneys. Of course they’re a top firm and there’s a huge continuum in quality and diligence. But that existed before LLMs.