Ha, well no. But clearly it's meant to emulate an Apple SKU. Yet another way it's using all the look and feel of an Apple item purchase to confuse the seller.

Ha, well no. But clearly it's meant to emulate an Apple SKU. Yet another way it's using all the look and feel of an Apple item purchase to confuse the seller. I think the problem is that even if the buyer is aware that orders may be fulfilled by a third party (big IF), it's not unreasonable that a buyer may assume there's been some kind of vetting to prove legitimacy.