I think negative externalities should be priced in. But it's a very complicated problem. With the above premise, where do you draw the line? For example, are y

I think negative externalities should be priced in. But it's a very complicated problem. With the above premise, where do you draw the line? For example, are you complicit if you use that electricity (or buy that cell phone made from unsavory practices)? From a legal standpoint, should you be charged because you materially benefitted from a criminal action?