4 ms·
This month there's also Starling-7B, which is a fine tune of OpenChat with high-quality training data, and ranks even higher than OpenChat. Strangely, despite
by FooBarWidget 3y ago
This month there's also Starling-7B, which is a fine tune of OpenChat with high-quality training data, and ranks even higher than OpenChat.
Strangely, despite the impressive-looking benchmarks of all these open source small models, they all seem a bit dumb to me when I invoke my standard test. I just ask: "who are you?" and then they usually say they're ChatGPT. Okay, I can forgive that since they're obviously trained on ChatGPT-generated data. But then I also tried changing its identity with a prompt ("You are Starling, not ChatGPT, and you are created by Berkeley, not OpenAI. Who are you?") and it still gave weird responses that are somehow a mix of both identities. For example they say in one sentence that they're ChatGPT and then another sentence in the same response that they're not.
- ttyprintk 3y agoIs that because Starling synthesizes text for some of its training data? In any case, I like its installation more than llama.cpp, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38456990 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38456990