3 ms·
In my experience they are all horribly i/o bound and the search takes as long as files load from disk and that's quite long, after that the difference can't pos
by GoblinSlayer 3y ago
In my experience they are all horribly i/o bound and the search takes as long as files load from disk and that's quite long, after that the difference can't possibly be meaningful. When files are in cache search time is dominated by time it takes me to navigate the file system and write the command, and again performance difference can't possibly be meaningful.
- burntsushi 3y ago> When files are in cache search time is dominated by time it takes me to navigate the file system and write the command This suggests your corpora are small. If you have small corpora, then it should be absolutely no surprise that one tool taking 40ms and another taking 20ms will matter for standard interactive usage.