2 ms·
It seems like the author agrees with you and picked a confusing title for the article. The article ends with a set of equations: user > ops > dev biz >
by mch82 3y ago
It seems like the author agrees with you and picked a confusing title for the article. The article ends with a set of equations:
user > ops > dev
biz > ops > dev
biz ≹ user
The conclusion seems to be that code exists in service to the end-user and the business. The last equation (≹) is a neat way of describing that both end-user and the business are equally important to the existence of the code, even though their needs aren’t the same.
- Lutger 3y agoNeat summary. I think many developers experience the degree to which biz and user diverges as a source of problems: the more divergence, the more problems.
- kllrnohj 3y ago> picked a confusing title for the article Or they picked a title that would let you rapidly spot who didn't even skim the article.
- pindab0ter 3y agoOf all the functions a title could have, I feel this is not one of them. That would result in intentionally misleading titles.