I agree for select ad hoc cases but a chatbot seems unreliable enough to not be, at current, sustainable or scalable for this purpose. The article mentions "da

I agree for select ad hoc cases but a chatbot seems unreliable enough to not be, at current, sustainable or scalable for this purpose. The article mentions "dangerous precedent" along with > It may not always be able to account for the nuances and complexities of the law. Because ChatGPT is a machine learning system, it may not have the same level of understanding and judgment as a human lawyer when it comes to interpreting legal principles and precedent. This could lead to problems in situations where a more in-depth legal analysis is required which seem fair at present moment.