If you aren’t allowed to sell something, you don’t really own it. Whoever decides the valid sale conditions also owns part of it, it’s just off the books (so to

If you aren’t allowed to sell something, you don’t really own it. Whoever decides the valid sale conditions also owns part of it, it’s just off the books (so to speak). Do we really want governments implicitly part-owning companies that aren’t related to violence? At least a monopoly can be out innovated.