3 ms·
They could have a minimum interval between changes, while still allowing it to change quickly if enough time has elapsed since the previous "walk" signal.
by nerdbert 3y ago
They could have a minimum interval between changes, while still allowing it to change quickly if enough time has elapsed since the previous "walk" signal.
- AdieuToLogic 3y ago> They could have a minimum interval between changes, while still allowing it to change quickly if enough time has elapsed since the previous "walk" signal. This approach would not satisfy the very real use-case scenario of pedestrians pressing the request button whilst having no intention to cross. By having a "request -> delay -> satisfy" workflow, instead of a "request -> satisfy -> delay" one, traffic engineers can at least minimize the impact of random jerks.