4 ms·
With how much manipulation happens to photos by default it seems like it would be easier to get them thrown out of court as evidence
by weird-eye-issue 3y ago
With how much manipulation happens to photos by default it seems like it would be easier to get them thrown out of court as evidence
- j16sdiz 3y agoWithout better evidence, the court will keep accepting them. Just look at how bad fingerprints are accepted
- callalex 3y agoSee also: polygraphs.
- zimpenfish 3y agoSee also: bite mark evidence[0], blood splatter[1], etc.[2] [0] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/28/forensics-bite-mark-junk-science-charles-mccrory-chris-fabricant https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/28/forensics-bi... [1] https://features.propublica.org/blood-spatter/blood-spatter-criminal-justice-courts-forensic-evidence/ https://features.propublica.org/blood-spatter/blood-spatter-... [2] https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/01/we-need-to-get-junk-science-out-of-courtrooms https://www.currentaffairs.org/2023/01/we-need-to-get-junk-s...
- actionfromafar 3y agoI'd say, the courts will keep accepting bad evidence no matter what you do.
- joeframbach 3y agoIt's not so farfetched. https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/10/22775580/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-judge-apple-ai-pinch-to-zoom-footage-manipulation-claim https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/10/22775580/kyle-rittenhous...