> It's a case of getting your pitchfork because you heard a rumor. Completely disagree, it's a case of using an argument that isn't exactly what you think beca

> It's a case of getting your pitchfork because you heard a rumor. Completely disagree, it's a case of using an argument that isn't exactly what you think because you think it will serve your agenda better. The people complaining here want to get rid of gay content, they don't want themselves to be warned about it - just happens that saying the latter makes them sound more reasonable (well: slightly less unreasonable). Of course, the overall homophobia thing is roughly speaking a case of pitchfork/rumour, people who become bigots through hearing that they ought to be, not any logic at all.