4 ms·
A few months ago I had a converastion about some of my open data civic work with Brad Burnham. He challanged me to really think about how I could disrupt goverm
by zt 15y ago
A few months ago I had a converastion about some of my open data civic work with Brad Burnham. He challanged me to really think about how I could disrupt goverment to get them to release new data and to innovate. He noted that you never want to be in the business of asking permission of the slow-moving giant to make your business work--so I should figure out what I can do without the government's permission. It's great advice on the whole, but the reality is that the slow-moving giant might really be technology companies (that are often also consulting firms) that have no reason, and maybe no ability, to innovate with government.
There just aren't that many firms in the enterprise solutions space that work closely with government: Accenture, IBM, Booz Allen Hamilton, Deloitte. What I love about this CfA accelerator is that it might get people to focus on a business sector that has huge upside if only you can break through. Technologists should get together and try to break up the slow-moving giant's dance with governments: it is the one of the ways we're going to get a government than might be both better and cheaper. This seems like a great first step.
- untog 15y agoAbsolutely. I used to work for a government body and saw time and time again that we'd go with huge, inflexible solutions using technologies like SAP, because that's what the large consulting company insisted on. But: the people making these choices aren't stupid. Government has very little appetite for the startup-style thinking of trying something, trashing it and iterating. Maybe it's because tax payer money is at stake, but any kind of risky venture is seen as a bad thing. We have to combat that, first.
- rprospero 15y agoI'd say that it's not that risk isn't appreciated. Rather, risk tends to be taken in a rather bi-polar way. 99% of the time, the government goes with the giant, ossified consulting firm. However, 1% of the time, they decide to take a risk. They don't just go with the local start-up, though. They hire Bob's nephew, who's "a real whiz with computers." Bob's nephew puts together a minimum viable product, then Bob's 12 year old nephew accidentally sends out a mass e-mail with everyone's medical records. The agency then gets accused of not taking privacy seriously, so a whole new set of privacy rules are enacted. Only a industrial giants have the patience to wade through this paperwork, so they scoop up every job for a while. Eventually, someone looks at the insane standards and points out that the government could save millions of dollars that they're paying to IBM by just hiring a startup. Bob then points out that they could save thousands of dollars on this bloated startup by just hiring his nephew.
- WalterSear 15y agoAnd who insisted on those large consulting firms?