> Sounds like you can't actually debate the merits of the argument. Sounds more like you're being "intellectually dishonest." It seems “intellectually dishones

> Sounds like you can't actually debate the merits of the argument. Sounds more like you're being "intellectually dishonest." It seems “intellectually dishonest” to leave out their next sentence. “Instead, we will focus on a few emblematic statements that stand in for a pattern of rhetoric that runs counter to our own values”