3 ms·
"Sharp" as in "low to the ground", not a literal sharp angle. A car with a low, rounded front won't maim as badly as the Cybertruck's sharp angle aimed at your
by dymk 3y ago
"Sharp" as in "low to the ground", not a literal sharp angle. A car with a low, rounded front won't maim as badly as the Cybertruck's sharp angle aimed at your torso.
What the article calls "blunt" (the thing that kills peds the most) is pretty much what the Cybertruck maximized.
- bryanlarsen 3y agoSure, but you'd likely fare better being hit by a Cybertruck than an F-150 or a Ranger or a large SUV.
- dymk 3y agoThe people who would consider buying an F150 or a sprinter van are not the people who would buy a Cybertruck. Smaller bed, can't tow nearly as much, lower range. The dominant market for this truck is going to be people who may as well buy a Model 3.
- tenpies 3y agoI was thinking Model X. Tesla has all but forgotten they make a Model X. It is incredibly dated, incredibly flawed, and has a reputation for being an awful SUV from a maintenance and gremlins perspective. But this decision makes sense if you consider the CT to be the replacement. Perfect for soccer moms and weekend warriors. Comfortable enough for day to day use and taking the family on a weekend trip, while still fitting your entire Costco haul.
- bryanlarsen 3y agoThe Cybertruck has a larger bed and longer range than an F150 Lightning SuperCrew.
- dymk 3y agoThat’s because you’re comparing it against the supercrew model… the model that sacrifices bed for cab…
- bryanlarsen 3y agoThe F150 Lightning is only available as Supercrew.
- dymk 3y agoI never said lightning, I said an F150 or sprinter van