4 ms·
How about all add-ons as specified by developers instead of this trashfire? Restricting add-ons in this way seems more like a Google move than a Mozilla one.
by arsome 3y ago
How about all add-ons as specified by developers instead of this trashfire?
Restricting add-ons in this way seems more like a Google move than a Mozilla one.
- Sakos 3y ago> Not all Firefox add-ons available from addons.mozilla.org will work with the mobile browser. But any extension marked as Android compatible should work, and if you want to browse a subset of compatible extensions, there’s a new page for that. If a developer marks their addon as compatible with the mobile version, you can install it. Mozilla isn't adding any of these addons themselves, it's all up to the devs now.
- Zuiii 3y agoSo if I take the source code and change the manifest to indicate that it is compatible, then it should work out of the box? I still don't understand why they don't do what kiwi does. It supports all the chrome addons without modification.
- joak 3y agoI'm sticking with kiwi: Firefox is still missing the must needed "I don't mind about cookies" extension. In Europe, by law, each time you open a page you get a weird and annoying popup saying something like: "the website uses cookies, are you ok with that?". The extension just nix the nonsense popup.