2 ms·

Good point. How far off would you say LLMs are today compared to "human levels of trust-worthiness / perfection / output"?

• staunton 3y ago
  I think it depends very much on the domain. LLMs are good at certain things and bad at others and these strengths and weaknesses are different from humans. The trick is to figure out how good they are at certain tasks and where it's a benefit to use them. For example, in many situations it's much harder to have a good idea/solution than to check any single solution and see if it really works. A lot of the time you don't necessarily need trust-worthiness. On the other had, of course LLMs will improve and get more trustworthy (and we will learn what to expect from them, which will make them seem even more trustworthy). I don't pretend to know how fast or big improvements will be...