I assume there are different competing priorities at play that converge in particularly dumb ways sometimes. Some stakeholders latched onto the idea of churnin

I assume there are different competing priorities at play that converge in particularly dumb ways sometimes. Some stakeholders latched onto the idea of churning some % of staff each year in an effort to, I guess, eventually filter the entire human population for the best possible employees. Some people want to make it look like their HR team is doing a lot of useful stuff. Some people want to boost their own department's metrics. Some people want to work with a team to achieve actual business goals.