4 ms·
I meant the Galileans. I'm going to ignore the accusatory tone and not debate further.
by vikingerik 3y ago
I meant the Galileans. I'm going to ignore the accusatory tone and not debate further.
- digging 3y agoI'm only further confused. I literally don't have any idea if the system you're describing is similar to the one in the article without looking up the data and doing the math. You claimed they're similar, so I figured you had done the math, and I wanted you to show me so I could believe you. If you take that as offensive, after making a technical comment, I don't know what the point of this conversation is.
- ant6n 3y agoOmg this is tedious
- digging 3y ago[flagged]
- unethical_ban 3y agoIn case this isn't a troll, let it be known that a detailed, sources-cited comment in a friendly thread isn't expected. It's one thing to ask "hey, what satellites are you talking about, I'm unaware", vs. the tone of expectation and admonishment presented.
- digging 3y agoI guess I messed up in thinking that the comment was a response to my mention of the tiny orbits of these planets then. Because if it was, it was not a good response, since I still don't even know if the system mentioned is in actually similar to the one in TFA. So I guess it was just an offhand comment about something unrelated and I should have ignored it.
- ramblenode 3y agoThe parent isn't trying to prove this to you like an argument in a debate. They are providing you with a potential direction for further research in case you are interested in learning more.