3 ms·
Create a cute avatar from your photo. Powered by DALL-E 3
- tikkun 3y agoNot my product, but looks cool.
- rambambram 3y ago"Something went wrong", two times.
- infecto 3y agoThey allude to it but do not fully explain. I am assuming they are also using the vision model to describe the input photo. I would not have initially thought that you given the text description of an image you could recreate it well enough for fun avatars...it makes sense but I did not initially think about it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- nvoeiah 3y agoI have to try three times because it says something went wrong. Then it generates an image that looks nothing like the one I uploaded. And then the next time I try it says I made too many requests. So, it would be cool if it worked I guess.
- MrOxiMoron 3y agogenerated something that doesn't look like me at all, didn't "see" my glasses and gave me a full beard I don't have.
- sigmonsays 3y agoi got glasses and it looks nothing like me. everything is inaccurate.
- whyenot 3y agoNeat idea, but it return an avatar of someone that doesn't look even remotely like me.
- matusnovak 3y agoI have tried it and I have expected that it would look similar to the selfie, but the output does not look like me. It looks more like a random stock photo. Perhaps that was the intention?
- jeffbee 3y agoAll these models can do is regurgitate an approximation of a stored image.
- not2b 3y agoMine kinda sucked. First, it made an avatar with two almost identical heads in it. I have a high forehead, the two people in the avatar had full, thick hair. I have brown eyes, the avatar twins have large, deep blue eyes. The only thing in common with my image was that the avatar people have a salt and pepper beard, like I do.
- bestouff 3y agoMine sucked completely. It is not me at all. I wish I could post images easily to show how far the avatar is from the original.
- pelasaco 3y agoMy team decided to use it to represent our team. Now the "avatars" means nothing, other teams check our picture and cannot say who is who..
- samrolken 3y agoOpenAI's products and DALL-E 3 can't really transform existing images. GPT-V lets it see images, and DALL-E 3 can make images. But they aren't directly connected. > We'll analyse your photo, describe it in words, and generate a new image from scratch. I've tried the same technique to get around "copyright policy" refusals, but never get anything close to what I want.
- bigpeach 3y agoYour pricing is absolutely ridiculous. I ran a full image generation site (like Leonardo), so I know what it costs to run models/generate images. I'm shocked people are willing to pay you that much money. Your margins must be like 99%
- nathanaldensr 3y ago"AI" is just the latest grift in a long, long line.
- benterix 3y agoexpensive and inaccurate
- rpmisms 3y agoAre there any models properly trained for avatar creation/charicature? The image-to-text-to-image approach is seriously lacking.
- glimshe 3y agoMine had, like, zero resemblance to my photo. It looks like a completely different person. Flagging this as a scam and I regret having sent a photo.
- amanzi 3y agoThose that are complaining about the lack of resemblance, may have missed the text explaining how this works: "We'll analyse your photo, describe it in words, and generate a new image from scratch." Mine was also way off, but if I think about how an AI would describe the photo and then regenerate it, then it's probably pretty close to that.