"They shouldn't be audited because they're obviously not legit"? That doesn't make sense. If KPMG steps up and says "hey CC buyers, show me your operations and

"They shouldn't be audited because they're obviously not legit"? That doesn't make sense. If KPMG steps up and says "hey CC buyers, show me your operations and books", either 1) they refuse, and KPMG says "Green-n-Co refuses to be audited", and demand for CC (by your presumption, bullshit) goes down. 2) they get audited, KPMG reports "Green-n-Co is bullshit", and demand for BS goes down. or... 3) audited, report says "Green-n-Co met 93% of their stated goals, we found X areas for improvement", and (presumably) GnC only gets better, and demand for working CC services increase. So you're either against (reduced demand for bullshit), or against reducing CO2? Help me understand.