> AI companies bundle all of them, say that their models are learning like a human, and this is fair use and training data is non-reproducible. Then someone sho

> AI companies bundle all of them, say that their models are learning like a human, and this is fair use and training data is non-reproducible. Then someone shows that their code, work, poem, whatever can be emitted as-is, damaging them; same companies act surprised, and a couple of censor filters, and go on. If it is fair use, why are they adding censor filter exceptions at all? "Tim Burton's style" appears to be a banned term on Bing Chat Enterprise.