3 ms·
Stack Ranking was pioneered by Jack Welch who was operating in an environment where labor was the dominant party in the labor-capital relationship, and he was t
by ep103 3y ago
Stack Ranking was pioneered by Jack Welch who was operating in an environment where labor was the dominant party in the labor-capital relationship, and he was taking over companies that had had decades of labor growth and power while capital was stagflating nationwide. Introducing stack ranking was a way of trimming excess fat from decades of build up within companies, while reasserting capital in the relationship within the company.
Long term, it has been a disaster in every company. Because eventually you run out of fat, and then what you describe as "far more willing to hire non-standard candidates on gut and hunches, knowing that if it didn't work out, it didn't work out they would be gone" becomes "I need to hire people I don't want to work with, so I have someone to fire in the next stack rank". And that's its own form of fat.
In short, stack ranking makes some sense if you have a fat organization, not unlike restricting calories to lose fat when working out. But once you've lost fat, continuing to restrict your calories results in losing more muscle than fat.
- psunavy03 3y ago> "I need to hire people I don't want to work with, so I have someone to fire in the next stack rank". And that's its own form of fat. There's a great long-form article on this called "Microsoft's Lost Decade."
- Terr_ 3y agoRef: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/business/2012/08/microsoft-lost-mojo-steve-ballmer https://www.vanityfair.com/news/business/2012/08/microsoft-l...
- steveBK123 3y agoJack Welch also mostly made his mark by juicing earnings via both financializing the whole company going into the GFC, and by doing various forms of (probably illegal then, definitely now) accounting tricks to smooth earnings to always make his number. GE was run into the ground by his tenure.
- twiddling 3y agoThis. GE Financial was an earnings laundering operation
- therealdrag0 3y agoIsn’t that just a tuning problem? If the required fire % is low enough relative to hiring rate then people won’t hire to fire.