4 ms·
It seems more likely that there will be multiple avenues to AGI, all with their strengths and weaknesses. But perhaps the "God AI" will be a multifaceted model
by Workaccount2 3y ago
It seems more likely that there will be multiple avenues to AGI, all with their strengths and weaknesses. But perhaps the "God AI" will be a multifaceted model composed of many different models acting in unison.
- falcor84 3y agoExactly, just as the true god has seven aspects [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Themes_in_A_Song_of_Ice_and_Fire#Faith_of_the_Seven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Themes_in_A_Song_of_Ice_and_Fi...
- bee_rider 3y agoOn the other hand, most of the original gods were parts of polytheistic pantheons. Maybe a bunch of models that represent identities and biases could be more useful, they could argue amongst themselves, presenting a more full point of view, users could become familiar with the particular perspectives.
- kstrauser 3y agoI could see something like the "modularity of mind" model of human consciousness, where multiple approaches are working on "subconscious" solutions to a given problem in parallel, with a top layer deciding which is appropriate at the moment. My human brain doesn't use the same algorithm for learning to play a song on a piano as learning to play a new board game. I'm not an AI person, but it seems reasonable to imagine we'd have different "modules" to apply as needed. AlphaGo probably sucks at conversation. ChatGPT can't play Go. The part of my brain writing this couldn't throw a baseball. The physics engine that lets me throw a baseball couldn't write this. Is there a reason we'd want or need one specific AI approach to be universally applicable?
- platz 3y agoThe Bicameral Mind
- two_in_one 3y agoMost likely there will be more then one specimen claiming to be AGI. From different groups. And they will be hard to compare.