3 ms·

Worth noting that this came from DeepMind in Sep-Oct of this year, so it's not related to OpenAI's "unfortunate" leak [0] of Q*. [0] https://www.theverge.com/2

• jansan 3y ago
  Also, it is not Amazon Q, which was presented yesterday: https://aws.amazon.com/de/q/ https://aws.amazon.com/de/q/
  • 3cats-in-a-coat 3y ago
    Also it's not Q from Star Trek, or Q stars which are an exotic form of matter immediately preceding the singularity of a black hole.
    • GTP 3y ago
      Also, it's not Android Q.
      • kristjansson 3y ago
        Or James Bond’s Q.
        • behnamoh 3y ago
          or Q.
• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
• px43 3y ago
  I wouldn't go that far. Immediately after Q* leaked, Jimmy Apples pointed to this thread on Twitter : https://twitter.com/polynoamial/status/1676971508911198209 https://twitter.com/polynoamial/status/1676971508911198209 It's Noam Brown's (former Deep Mind) "I'm joining OpenAI" thread from Back in June, and he talks about how he wants to bring some of the work from AlphaGoZero etc into OpenAI's AGI architecture. It looks like this Q-transformer work shares a lot of the same lineage of what Q* is supposed to be. This is Google's attempt at mushing Q-learning into transformer land, which is probably what Q* is as well. It's not the same thing, for sure, but they are at least sibling bodies of work.