3 ms·
This is a sentiment that I see frequently on HN, and I'm not exactly sure why. I was a "questionably" contracted employee for awhile, and I never once felt exp
by courtewing 15y ago
This is a sentiment that I see frequently on HN, and I'm not exactly sure why. I was a "questionably" contracted employee for awhile, and I never once felt exploited by the company, and I'm confident that they never felt that they were exploiting me.
Sure, being contractors might not be ideal for them at the moment, but they are the first 8 employees at the company. There are additional benefits to being in that situation.
In addition, we have no idea how much they do or do not understand their employment status. It is convenient for us to jump to the conclusion that the employees are ignorant about tax law, but that very well may not be the case. Just like in any other service industry, there are plenty of educated and informed workers in the mix, especially when you start looking at those that tend to excel in that particular field (he did say he now only hires top notch folk, after all).
I guess what I'm saying is, the discussion about W2 vs 1099 in this case is both valid and valuable, but let's not jump to any conclusions about who is exploiting whom.
- ricardobeat 15y agoI think you fell on the wrong comment tree. The "exploitation" in discussion has nothing to do with the employment laws discussed above.
- courtewing 15y agoAfter re-reading your comment and the one to which it replied, I see that you are correct. My reply was not in the wrong tree but rather based on an incorrect assumption. Pardon my ignorance, but what "exploitation" is being discussed here?
- paulhauggis 15y agoright. You're one of those left-wing, the government should force "equality" people.