3 ms·
You're absolutely right. But in the case of "twice as fast", if it is twice as fast under the right conditions then it's not exactly a false claim. Maybe the ri
by jm4 18y ago
You're absolutely right. But in the case of "twice as fast", if it is twice as fast under the right conditions then it's not exactly a false claim. Maybe the right condition for the phone being twice as fast is being within a short distance of a cell tower. The fact that at any given time a user likely won't be within that distance is certainly deceptive in that it doesn't present the entire truth, but it's going to be extremely difficult to prove it's a false claim.
- sh1mmer 18y agoIn that case why dispute the claim? Or at least why not add small print to clarify the point to a layman that performance varies.
- scott_s 18y agoThe FTC disallows deceptive advertising as well: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/policystmt/ad-decept.htm http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/policystmt/ad-decept.htm