5 ms·
> Those wars in Cambodia and Vietnam didn't further the interests of the US at all. It's easy to judge history in hindsight. USA bombed the crap out of Japan
by wordpad25 3y ago
> Those wars in Cambodia and Vietnam didn't further the interests of the US at all.
It's easy to judge history in hindsight.
USA bombed the crap out of Japan during WW2, and Japan had amazing recovery.
Not to say that Cambodia was at all justified (or Japan for that matter), but that it's more complicated.
It's a lot easier to judge a person on objective things, like how effective they were at executing their policy.
- defrost 3y agoFor context: Between 1965 and 1975, the United States and its allies dropped more than 7.5 million tons of bombs on Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia—double the amount dropped on Europe and Asia during World War II. Pound for pound, it remains the largest aerial bombardment in human history. Japan's "amazing recovery" wasn't hampered by a legacy of UXB (unexploded bombs) that still kill and cripple children to this day.
- fatbird 3y agoAmerica had total control of Japan following their surrender, and the time/power/resources to rebuild Japan as they saw fit (which was to become an eastern bulwark of capitalist freedom, against China and Russia). Bombing Cambodia had the much more cynical purpose of convincing Ho Chi Min that Nixon was an unrestrained madman whose demands in peace talks had to be surrendered to, to avoid further mindless devastation for all involved. Yes, it was more complicated in the details, but pretty damn clear in the larger picture.
- quickthrowman 3y ago> It's easy to judge history in hindsight. USA bombed the crap out of Japan during WW2, and Japan had amazing recovery. Did you happen to forget that the United States occupied and reconstructed Japan from 1945-1952? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Japan https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Japan It helps to be familiar with history before making judgements about it.