3 ms·
It's also a good reminder that public judgement isn't worth much for any personality who had access to lots of bonafide top secret information. A lot of sensit
by MichaelZuo 3y ago
It's also a good reminder that public judgement isn't worth much for any personality who had access to lots of bonafide top secret information.
A lot of sensitive diplomatic and military records from even the 60s are yet to be declassified, so the final verdict of future historians will likely rest on much different information then we can access today.
- sp0rk 3y agoCan you give any examples of somebody that was unjustly vilified by the public until top secret information was released that exonerated them?
- mablopoule 3y agoNot necessarily 'unjustly vilified', but most of Edgar Hoover's biography were done before the extend on soviet spying in the US was declassified. It talked about a very interesting podcast on a previous comment [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36257604 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36257604
- MichaelZuo 3y agoFor example, Harry Truman, and his sacking of MacArthur. Now that there's been more info released regarding Army biowarfare programs in the late 40s/early 50s, recruitment of the Japanese specialists immediately after WW2, etc...
- arp242 3y agoThat's all very fine but worthless for people voting today.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoHow is this relevant? The voter's estimation of worth barely influence Kissinger types at all.