That clearly has nothing to do with what I said, and the accusation is not that the reviewer "referred" to an AI. And for the same reasons I laid out, if a rev

That clearly has nothing to do with what I said, and the accusation is not that the reviewer "referred" to an AI. And for the same reasons I laid out, if a reviewer thinks they need to "refer" to an AI, they should just tell the editor they're not qualified. The editor does not need a reviewer to serve as a middleman between them and a GPT. The reviewer is adding no value at that point; the editor can already "refer" to an AI themselves if they want to.