4 ms·
It seems to be the life cycle of digital communities. There's a certain threshold of critical-mass popularity where quality of content almost seems to become in
by Zandikar 3y ago
It seems to be the life cycle of digital communities. There's a certain threshold of critical-mass popularity where quality of content almost seems to become inversely proportional to quantity of people in the community. That threshold is a moving target, but it certainly seems to manifest around the same time as people start throwing around the letters IPO; or at least, when the community is big enough for some MBA to come in and try and squeeze them for profit.
I admit I'm unclear on the exact nature of HN and YC, but with YC being a VC, and my assumption that HN is a property of YC, I think two big things HN has going for it is that it's probably not going to IPO as a result of that situation and dang does a fantastic job moderating (there's something to be said for a well moderated community, most don't appreciate that).
Never know when company will decide it's time for a pivot and shake things up though.
- woooooo 3y agoHN seems immune to VC pressures specifically because it's owned by a VC. Single core process, single server, single moderator. No react, no chasing growth. It's actually right-sized or even undersized because it's intentionally a loss leader.
- barryrandall 3y agoIt's owned by a capital management company and it will eventually be given the capital treatment and sold to someone else, probably with very different motives.
- dakial1 3y agoUntil someone at YC says: Hmmm we have a lot of traffic on HN, we should monetize it...