4 ms·
Oversimplified, but the efficiency cores are slower in the M3 vs the M1, and Ableton seems like the sort of app where lots of tasks would land there. "(Ableton
by tyingq 3y ago
Oversimplified, but the efficiency cores are slower in the M3 vs the M1, and Ableton seems like the sort of app where lots of tasks would land there.
"(Ableton) Live supports up to 64 cores for audio processing on Mac and Windows. Likewise, Live supports up to 64 processing threads for audio calculation." https://help.ableton.com/hc/en-us/articles/209067649-Multi-core-CPU-handling https://help.ableton.com/hc/en-us/articles/209067649-Multi-c...
- wtallis 3y ago> but the efficiency cores are slower in the M3 vs the M1, I think that's only true when comparing M3 Pro vs M1 Pro (rather than the base M chips that each have 4 efficiency cores), and only when running threads with a background-priority QoS setting. Testing like [1] has shown that macOS runs background threads on M1 Pro/Max efficiency cores at higher clock speeds to compensate for only having two of those efficiency cores compared to 4-6 for all the other chips. But when normal-priority threads spill onto efficiency cores because the performance cores are full, the efficiency cores run at full speed on all chips. [1] https://eclecticlight.co/2023/11/27/evaluating-m3-pro-cpu-cores-1-general-performance/ https://eclecticlight.co/2023/11/27/evaluating-m3-pro-cpu-co...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]