4 ms·
I absolutely agree, but I find the situation incredibly funny. There are three characters here: me, the LLM, and the compiler. Two of them are robots, but they
by jkaptur 3y ago
I absolutely agree, but I find the situation incredibly funny. There are three characters here: me, the LLM, and the compiler. Two of them are robots, but they refuse to talk to each other - it's up to me to tell the LLM the bad news from the compiler.
- sa-code 3y agoThis sounds like the worst game of telephone
- fragmede 3y agothat's a frontend issue though. If you use the python interpreter in ChatGPT, you can tell it to run the code until it works, at which point it'll do a couple of iterations before giving you code.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- jgalt212 3y agoHow many people are putting service credentials into a ChatGPT Python interpreter to see if their generated code "works"?
- notjoemama 3y agoOne of our very large customers was hit with ransomware recently. So…best practice is don’t do things like that.
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoYou can just use your own.... There is still the risk GPT-4 gives you ~ "delete all the things" and you blindly run it on your infra, but.. it's better than what. you describe.
- convolvatron 3y agodont you already cut and paste your error message to google like everyone else?
- stavros 3y agoI decided to cut out the middleman: https://github.com/skorokithakis/sysaidmin/ https://github.com/skorokithakis/sysaidmin/
- actionfromafar 3y agoHm, that’s true. I guess someone could have hooked up pattern matching and google search results and iterated that directly into some IDE.
- pjerem 3y agoIt will come. In fact, GPT is really good at correcting its code given the compiler output. We just need to automate that. I think that this is not done yet because LLMs costs are O(n+1) so you really don’t want it to be stuck in some loop.