3 ms·
I like textql [0] better for this use case, as it's simpler in my mind. [0] https://github.com/dinedal/textql https://github.com/dinedal/textql
by MrDrMcCoy 3y ago
I like textql [0] better for this use case, as it's simpler in my mind.
[0] https://github.com/dinedal/textql https://github.com/dinedal/textql
- bdcravens 3y agotextql doesn't seem to work with JSON. I think the grandparent comment meant that the data was in a table of sorts, represented in JSON.
- MrDrMcCoy 3y agoAh, you're right. TextQL combined with Miller would be closer, but DuckDB can do the same things all in one. Always good to have a variety of tools to choose from.