3 ms·
If that's copyright washing so are Cliff's Notes.
by jnwatson 3y ago
If that's copyright washing so are Cliff's Notes.
- xp84 3y agoYup, though a lot of people are acting now as though every already-established principle of fair use needs to be revised suddenly by adding a bunch of "...but if this is done by any form of AI, then it's copyright infringement." A cover band who plays Beatles songs = great An artist who paints you a picture in the style of so-and-so = great An AI who is trained on Beatles songs and can write new ones = exploitative, stealing, etc. An AI who paints you a picture in the style of so-and-so = get the pitchforks, Big Tech wants to kill art!
- blitzar 3y ago> A cover band who plays Beatles songs Has to pay the Beatles for the pleasure of doing so.
- whstl 3y agoThis discussion about art "in the style of" being stealing or exploitative hasn't started with AI. For quite some time there has been complaints of advertisements commissioning sound-alike tunes to avoid paying licensing. AI is only automating it and making it possible in an industrial scale.
- lewhoo 3y agoWell, I don't know about that. I strongly suspect chatgpt could deliver whole copyrighted books piece by piece. I suspect that because it most certainly can do that with non-copyrighted text. Just ask it to give you something out of the Bible or Moby Dick. Cliff Notes can't do that.