Okay. I would be interested in a link for the the rule-set. I understand I'm a guest here at HN, and will respect the rules. AI can definitely help with disabi

Okay. I would be interested in a link for the the rule-set. I understand I'm a guest here at HN, and will respect the rules. AI can definitely help with disabilities in communication, but I think it goes much further than this. Non-native language, human bias/error, difference in culture and norms - leading to unproductive discourse, for example.. In any case, I think Q would be a perfect name for an AI producing these snarky (humanly) ego-driven comment we're both guilty of.. I see I'm loosing some internet-points in this discussion (downvotes - I don't even have that capability so can't retaliate, feel like punching bag), so unsure I feel comfortable continuing. Would like to know why people downvote. I think there's some pretty interesting topics brought up between us: honesty in online communications, AI transparency, what constitutes human interaction? However it seems HN is not the place for this, and maybe there's merit in this point, especially with the post being about Amazon Q AI. So let's end it here.