The correct answer to all this type of smear campaign (they do this to beef, among other thigns) is "yah, so what? If there's a sustainability problem raise the

The correct answer to all this type of smear campaign (they do this to beef, among other thigns) is "yah, so what? If there's a sustainability problem raise the price of water until a sustainable amount is being used across all uses. If there's a claimed externality not being priced that externality exists for all uses, so raise the price until the externality is covered and see who is using what after that." This whole line of argument is utterly stupid because it assumes incorrectly that the complainer should have input into what I do in my life and that is the polar opposite of how a western country, especially the USA, works constitutionally.