>None of that relies on the computer having choice in the matter. Most normally functioning people would not feel the need to punish a tool for being a bad too

>None of that relies on the computer having choice in the matter. Most normally functioning people would not feel the need to punish a tool for being a bad tool. Some may find catharsis in damaging some object that has frustrated them, but usually they later recognize the absurdity of their outburst. The point is that we all generally recognize that there are legitimate and illegitimate targets for "punishment". The question is whether people are actually legitimate targets for punishment despite our intuitions on the matter. >you can hold someone guilty of "being bad" just as easily as making "bad choices" Sure you can; nothing is going to stop you from smashing your PC to bits next time it crashes. The issue is whether it is the all things considered correct choice.