4 ms·
The user still has the option not to consent to either option, in which case they don't get to use the service and their privacy is respected. I don't think th
by xeckr 3y ago
The user still has the option not to consent to either option, in which case they don't get to use the service and their privacy is respected.
I don't think there is a case to be made against Meta here. What alternative did the group envision exactly? The company has to make money somehow, so "free and private" is off the table. That leaves us with the option "pay or your account gets deactivated", but who benefits from this solution?
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoIt's one thing to not read the article, another to not read the other comments in a discussion forum. :D A lot of people are mentioning the possibility of ads without tracking or the gathering of personal information. Less lucrative for Meta, but certainly a workable alternative.