The thing is, I can't find any part of that ruling[0] that even remotely matches Meta's claim. Can somebody point it out for me? And it makes sense that there

The thing is, I can't find any part of that ruling[0] that even remotely matches Meta's claim. Can somebody point it out for me? And it makes sense that there is nothing like that in there. Subscriptions were totally irrelevant to the actual questions that the CJEU was asked to rule on in that case (which was e.g. a claim by the German competition authorities that it was impossible for anyone to freely consent to tracking by Meta due to them having a dominant market position, and a counter-claim that the competition authorities did not even have jurisdiction over a GDPR case). [0] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62021CJ0252 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...