3 ms·
It's a interesting story, but the author may be overselling it. It's not a _failure_ story, nor was it a 500M mistake. I get that it was really stressful and th
by HeavyStorm 3y ago
It's a interesting story, but the author may be overselling it. It's not a _failure_ story, nor was it a 500M mistake. I get that it was really stressful and the mistake could have cost him the job, but it didn't; it also didn't cost NASA anything other than a few hours of work (which, during testing, I would guess it's expected).
When I'm asked to share failures, I'm usually not thinking about "that one time when I almost screwed up but everything was fine", instead, I'm thinking of when I actually did damage to the business and had to fix it somehow.
- felideon 3y ago“My quasi-$500M Mars rover mistake” just doesn’t have quite the same ring to it. But, to your point, it is still a failure story that _could_ have lead to a much worse outcome than it did. The fact that it didn’t was mostly due to luck.