> CIFAR-10 and STL-10 > resized to 224x224 > susceptible to DCT compression cifar-10 and stl-10 images are 32x32 and 96x96.. isn’t this actually a demonstrat

> CIFAR-10 and STL-10 > resized to 224x224 > susceptible to DCT compression cifar-10 and stl-10 images are 32x32 and 96x96.. isn’t this actually a demonstration of locating where the textual encoding decision boundary is most fragile when the test image distribution is much lower resolution? or am i misunderstanding what the integrated gradients method uncovers? there’s a lot less ‘global’ semantic information to uncover and do inference upon when there’s a lot less ‘globe’ (visual information) to begin with, right?