4 ms·
Then the compensation model is inherently unfair if the rank and file is forced to bear the brunt of bad leadership.
by vore 3y ago
Then the compensation model is inherently unfair if the rank and file is forced to bear the brunt of bad leadership.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> the compensation model is inherently unfair if the rank and file is forced to bear the brunt of bad leadership Considering solely risk, sure. There are other relevant inputs. More pertinently, this is why we have public services and safety nets.
- fisf 3y agoSo we outsource bad decision making of overcompensated people to the public. Brilliant.
- monero-xmr 3y agoAnyone can put their hat in the ring and get into management. I wasn’t born with a silver spoon, I had no connections, and I attended a weak school. I worked my fucking ass off and networked everywhere I could. I built a reputation. If you can convince people that you are deserving of leadership, you have the guts to put yourself on the line in front of tens or hundreds or thousands of people, go ahead. This is your life and the people you are responsible for. If you do this and want to work for peanuts, be my guest. I get paid what the market thinks I’m worth.
- hnlmorg 3y agoI don’t disagree with what you posted but the last sentence needs highlighting: > I get paid what the market thinks I’m worth. It helps when “the market” is your peers who also benefit from benchmarking higher salaries for management.
- bobim 3y agoYou’re making all valid statements, but we see CEOs driving businesses into walls, and refuse to take responsibility. I size things for a living, a mistake can mean injury or death. If this happens I tell you I’ll have to bear the consequences. And I’m having an average pay. What’s the market thinks about this? Genuinely interested to know.