It's true that they're both part of the executive branch. However, one would be the recipient of the "delegation" of legislative power, whereas the enforcement

It's true that they're both part of the executive branch. However, one would be the recipient of the "delegation" of legislative power, whereas the enforcement component would not. Additionally, I think it's fair to assume that GP intended that the DOJ entity would bring enforcement actions in Article III courts. I'm not sure it's the right answer, but the proposal is interesting and deserves more than being dismissed out of hand.