3 ms·
Apart from the libertarian slant of the source, there is something to this, but should be narrowly confined to criminal and civil law. Outside of these areas:
by 1letterunixname 3y ago
Apart from the libertarian slant of the source, there is something to this, but should be narrowly confined to criminal and civil law.
Outside of these areas: Traffic courts across America, except for major cities, can be kangaroo courts after fees and fines. And, more broadly, the US has a legal system but not a justice system. Furthermore, binding arbitration is a fraudulent racket that sells the pretense of integrity and fairness but is nothing of the sort.
If people want to not be railroaded by an unfair practice, then they will have to organize, oppose it, and demand change.
- thsksbd 3y agobinding arbitration - in principal it is a good thing. People settle their differences in private without involving the public. And between two well matched opponents it works well. The problem is that I cant buy a car without being forced to sign one of those things.
- rascul 3y ago> Traffic courts across America, except for major cities, can be kangaroo courts after fees and fines. Traffic courts in major cities shouldn't be excepted. They're often just as bad, if not worse.