3 ms·
OP mentions using robots.txt to avoid crawling but even google ignores this now correct? 1. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-robots-txt-noindex/31496
by mtillman 3y ago
OP mentions using robots.txt to avoid crawling but even google ignores this now correct?
1. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-robots-txt-noindex/314961/ https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-robots-txt-noinde...
- lwhsiao 3y agoOP here. I'm not sure about the details in your link, but basically my understanding lines up with [1]; robots.txt isn't guaranteed to be respected, but generally is. FWIW, what I specifically have in robots.txt is User-agent: * Disallow: / which seems to work well for me so far (i.e., I do not find my house documentation site on any search engine). [1]: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/robots/intro#understand-the-limitations-of-a-robots.txt-file https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/...
- saalweachter 3y agoIf I understand the details of the link, it was a particular feature of robots.txt that was considered undocumented/unsupported that Google dropped support for. I think the point of it was that you could tell Google to crawl some pages (for links) but not index them?