4 ms·
And why is that?
by oa335 3y ago
And why is that?
- nearbuy 3y agoWhat do you mean? The article you linked never claims 80% of journalists were killed in their homes, or anything near that number. Where did you get that number from?
- oa335 3y agoI did not link the article. I was responding to the comment that stridently declared that the article provides no support for the claim that Israel is targeting journalists. I got the number by actually fully reading the article, counting up the number of Palestinians who were listed as killed in their home or with their families (around 30) and then of the remaining, reading the provided linked reports that gave more detail as to how the journalists died (around 8). 38 died in their homes, 49 Palestinian journalists killed totally, hence around 80 percent. I may be off by a couple since here or there, but to say that the article “doesn’t mention anything near that number” is a stretch.
- nearbuy 3y ago> 38 died in their homes, 49 Palestinian journalists killed totally, hence around 80 percent. But the article only lists 18 of the journalists as killed in their homes, out of 50 killed in Gaza. That's 36%.