5 ms·

I am incredibly excited about this. One thing that I'm curious about, however: it (seems like it) will be a web-based platform. Can anyone comment on whether o

I am incredibly excited about this. One thing that I'm curious about, however: it (seems like it) will be a web-based platform. Can anyone comment on whether or not this is an advantage or disadvantage? I imagine a fully functioning offline mode will be available, and I can see chaching things like documentation locally, etc. But there must be a compelling reason that newer editors are not web-based (or maybe the better term would be browser-based).

ibdknox 15y ago
it'll use a browser for the UI layer, but that's it. So browser-based is a better term I think. No internets needed. In the end, though, even that will probably be abstracted away into a webview or something. The overall distribution story is something I'm kind of curious about myself at this point. Lots of exploring to do there.
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
- rbxbx 15y ago
  Perhaps a tool similar to [Titanium](http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-desktop-application-development/ http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-desktop-applic...) would suit the needs of this project. Essentially you write your application in standard html/css/js and are then able to distribute OS-specific applications for all major platforms. Similar to PhoneGap, but I think the results are a bit better with desktop apps :) (especially something as "simple" as a text editor.
  - wahnfrieden 15y ago
    You can also just do this with Qt and QtWebKit. Qt5 is supposed to focus on this usage specifically though I haven't tried it.
    - dagw 15y ago
      I'm pretty sure Rstudio uses this approach. The core app is all HTML/Javascript, but then they make a desktop version by putting a thin Qt wrapper around it and adding a few minor things like a relevant menu bar.
    - jhchabran 15y ago
      That sounds a neat way to still provides a comfortable user experience whilst working on languages not easily embeddable in the browser.
      - wahnfrieden 15y ago
        Indeed, especially with PyQt. The problem is that your binaries can easily be huge on Mac/Win.
        jhchabran 15y ago
        Well we can imagine choosing a version statically linked or a dynamically linked one when dowloading ? I agree it isn't a really slick solution, but it's a tool for developers it won't hit too hard the entry barrier.

ibdknox 15y ago

it'll use a browser for the UI layer, but that's it. So browser-based is a better term I think. No internets needed. In the end, though, even that will probably be abstracted away into a webview or something. The overall distribution story is something I'm kind of curious about myself at this point. Lots of exploring to do there.

deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
rbxbx 15y ago
Perhaps a tool similar to [Titanium](http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-desktop-application-development/ http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-desktop-applic...) would suit the needs of this project. Essentially you write your application in standard html/css/js and are then able to distribute OS-specific applications for all major platforms. Similar to PhoneGap, but I think the results are a bit better with desktop apps :) (especially something as "simple" as a text editor.
- wahnfrieden 15y ago
  You can also just do this with Qt and QtWebKit. Qt5 is supposed to focus on this usage specifically though I haven't tried it.
  - dagw 15y ago
    I'm pretty sure Rstudio uses this approach. The core app is all HTML/Javascript, but then they make a desktop version by putting a thin Qt wrapper around it and adding a few minor things like a relevant menu bar.
  - jhchabran 15y ago
    That sounds a neat way to still provides a comfortable user experience whilst working on languages not easily embeddable in the browser.
    - wahnfrieden 15y ago
      Indeed, especially with PyQt. The problem is that your binaries can easily be huge on Mac/Win.
      - jhchabran 15y ago
        Well we can imagine choosing a version statically linked or a dynamically linked one when dowloading ? I agree it isn't a really slick solution, but it's a tool for developers it won't hit too hard the entry barrier.