You know, isn't it possible that the AIs might actually be better at rewriting human written SEO spam into better articles, even if they steal the content or id

You know, isn't it possible that the AIs might actually be better at rewriting human written SEO spam into better articles, even if they steal the content or ideas? Should "written by a biological person" really be the dominant factor for results ranking? Ideally we'd just get to the point where search results are themselves unnecessary because an AI can summarize the results, distinguish the spam from the good stuff on its own, and present original research without hallucination, citing prior sources (human or otherwise). The spam and lists/summaries problems might actually get better once it's just AI vs AI and there's no human in the loop and nobody putting money into SEO spam anymore because they can't outcompete the AI writers. Humans and AI can still both provide new material not yet in the training sets, but we can get rid of an entire industry of junk writing?