3 ms·
> which was open sourced under MIT license This seems like the main mistake. Try AGPLv3 instead.
by fsflover 3y ago
> which was open sourced under MIT license
This seems like the main mistake. Try AGPLv3 instead.
- rKarpinski 3y agoYes MIT is a very permissible license, the only requirement is to include it & you can do practically anything. But they didn't even do that so I'm not sure how a different license would help?
- fsflover 3y agoPerhaps MIT is known as "do whatever you want" license among ordinary people, so another license would force them to think before touching it.